1958-76 Thunderbird: The rise and fall of the Ford that shook up GM

1968 Ford Thunderbird

(EXPANDED FROM 10/1/2021)

The four-seater Thunderbird was a surprisingly pivotal car for the Ford Motor Company during the postwar period. The T-Bird showed that the No. 2 automaker could better compete against mighty General Motors if it pioneered new markets rather than trying to directly compete model for model.

The early four-seaters were remarkably subversive on a number of levels. For one thing, 1958-60 Thunderbird was the first Big Three postwar car to undercut the “hierarchy of brands” strategy that then dominated the US auto industry.

This approach was most highly developed at GM, where a car buyer could show they were moving up in the world by switching from the low-priced Chevrolet to a higher-priced Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick and — at the pinnacle — Cadillac. Each of these brands offered distinctive styling and mechanical features, but by the late-50s they shared a common platform.

1955 GM car ad
In the 1950s Ford spent a fortune vainly trying to better compete against GM’s highly successful five-brand pricing hierarchy. The success of the 1958-60 T-Bird showed that being different was a better strategy (Old Car Advertisements).

The Thunderbird challenged GM’s hierarchy of brands by competing price-wise against the automaker’s top-end premium-priced cars even though the personal coupe was sold through plebeian Ford dealers.

The Thunderbird was marketed as a premium-priced car despite being sold at Ford dealers (Old Car Advertisements).

T-Bird unleashes massive product-proliferation spree

A key reason the Thunderbird was able to develop an exceptional level of cachet may have been because it had a unique body with more sporting proportions than a typical premium-priced car. An unusually low height and long-hood, short-deck proportions would be widely copied by U.S. and foreign automakers.

Also see ‘1958-60 Lincoln: Failing to beat GM at its own game’

The Thunderbird single-handedly spurred a massive product-proliferation spree that resulted in a diversity of personal coupes, from the high-priced Cadillac Eldorado to subcompact “pony cars” such as the Toyota Celica. This is why the T-Bird is arguably one of the most significant halo cars of all time.

1960 Ford Thunderbird interior

1962 Ford Thunderbird interior

1966 Ford Thunderbird interior
The Thunderbird’s back seat was given an exotic shape that culminated in a curved-back design. Note how the convertible top was hidden underneath a deck panel. From top image, a 1960, 1962 and 1966 model (Old Car Brochures).

The Thunderbird also defied the then-dominant practice of fielding a broad range of body styles and trim variants. The early four-seaters were only available as a two-door hardtop and convertible — and in high-end trim.

Perhaps most importantly, the Thunderbird challenged the 1950s Detroit groupthink that the more expensive the car, the bigger it had to be. The 1958-60 T-Bird showed that the public would pay a premium price for a smaller car even during a recession.

The biggest irony of the Thunderbird is that it made a mockery of Ford’s hugely expensive effort to invade the premium-priced and luxury-car fields in the second half of the 1950s. Even though the four-seater T-Bird was a parenthetical effort, it was more successful than the launching of the Continental and Edsel brands and moving both the Mercury and Lincoln upmarket.

1962 Ford Thunderbird brochure
A portion of the cover of a 1962 Thunderbird brochure (Old Car Brochures)

Ford succeeds at what Studebaker failed to do

Although the Thunderbird is commonly thought of as having pioneered the personal coupe, that distinction should go to Studebaker. Indeed, Ford’s confidence in investing in a four-passenger T-Bird may have at least partially hinged on the early success of Studebaker’s low-slung two-door hardtop and coupe, which were designed by Raymond Loewy’s consulting firm. Almost 80,000 units were sold in 1953, its first year on the market. At the time that was extraordinary for a halo car lacking the room to be a family hauler.

1955 Studebaker President 2-door hardtop rear quarter

1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk
Sales of Studebaker’s low-slung “Loewy coupes” quickly tapered off despite stylistic updates. Pictured is a 1955 President (top image) and a 1956 Golden Hawk (click on images to go to photo galleries).

Unfortunately, Studebaker experienced a perfect storm of difficulties that resulted in coupe output declining to roughly 19,000 units in 1956. However, that was still good enough to outsell the two-seater Thunderbird for one more year. Note that 1956 was the first time the coupes were given a distinctive name — the Hawk — rather than referred to as body styles for Studebaker’s line of Champion, Commander and President family cars.

1957 Ford Thunderbird
In its final year as a two-seater, the 1957 Thunderbird outsold the Chevrolet Corvette by almost three-to-one. When Ford began planning to upsize the T-Bird, management even considered offering a wagon variant (Bonsall, 2002).

Once Ford added a back seat in 1958, output almost doubled to 38,000 units. In contrast, Hawk production fell to less than 8,300 units. It was mostly downhill from there for Studebaker’s increasingly archaic design, with volume never cracking 9,000 units again.

1962 Ford Thunderbird Landau

the Thunderbird's landau bars were iconic in the 1960s
The Thunderbird played a crucial role in launching the brougham era with a formal roofline that evoked the classic cars of the 1920s. A vinyl top with landau irons were introduced in 1962 on a top-of-line Landau model (Old Car Brochures).

Four-seater T-Bird takes on top premium-priced cars

A key reason why the two-seater died was because Ford Division Manager Robert McNamara didn’t see much profit potential in the car. However, he advocated for the four-seater because he thought it could be a real money maker — which turned out to be astute thinking (Langworth, 1987).

The four-place Thunderbird immediately sold well despite its relatively high price, which hovered in the vicinity of upper-premium nameplates such as the Buick Electra, Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight, Chrysler New Yorker, Edsel Citation and Mercury Park Lane.

1966 Ford Thunderbird taillight
Through most of the 1960s Ford saved for the Thunderbird some of the automaker’s biggest styling gimmicks such as sequential turn signals, which were introduced on 1965 models, and full-width taillights, which followed in 1966.

As a case in point, for 1960 Ford produced roughly 30,000 more Thunderbirds than the highest-selling upper-premium nameplate, the Electra. The T-Bird also outproduced the Park Lane by a whopping nine-to-one margin.

By the same token, the Thunderbird’s success may have been the final nail in the Edsel’s coffin. Whereas the Edsel saw only 63,000 cars leave the factory in its peak year of 1958, Ford produced almost 93,000 Thunderbirds in 1960.

McNamara — who became increasingly powerful at Ford in the late-50s and early-60s — quite rightly recognized that the failure of the Mercury and Edsel wasn’t just one of timing and execution. Instead, he presciently saw that Ford’s future success depended upon being different from GM.

1962 Ford Thunderbird

1962 LIncoln
When the Thunderbird and Lincoln Continental were placed on the same platform in 1961, their styling was so well differentiated that most may not have noticed that they shared the same windshield (Old Car Advertisements).

McNamara pressed for an abrupt reversal of Ford’s expansion plans. The Edsel was discontinued, the Continental was merged with Lincoln, the Mercury was downsized to a modestly changed Ford, and for 1961 the Lincoln was placed on the same platform as the T-Bird.

1956-76 premium and luxury personal coupe production

GM initially competes with the T-Bird on the cheap

GM waited five years before coming out with a direct competitor to the Thunderbird. This may have partly been because GM already dominated the upper-reaches of the premium-priced field. Introducing a personal coupe might have cannibalized sales of the Electra and Ninety-Eight.

In addition, once GM did start to offer sportier versions of its full-sized cars they sold almost as well as the Thunderbird. In 1962 the output of the newly introduced Pontiac Grand Prix and Oldsmobile Starfire together came within 6,000 units of matching the T-bird’s. This was despite these models lacking exclusive sheetmetal. It probably helped that both were priced lower than the T-Bird (particularly the Grand Prix).

1962 Pontiac Grand Prix

1962 Oldsmobile Starfire
The 1962 Pontiac Grand Prix (top image) and Oldsmobile Starfire offered top-of-line features such a bucket seats and a center console but no unique sheetmetal (Old Car Brochures).

Once GM introduced the Buick Riviera, it did not threaten the Thunderbird’s sales leadership from 1963-65. Indeed, the main impact of the Riviera was to expand the premium-priced personal coupe market to over 100,000 units per year. Perhaps part of the Riviera’s problem was that it was based upon the full-sized Buick. Even though it had unique sheetmetal, it didn’t come off as distinctive as the T-Bird.

1965 Buick Riviera C-pillar

1965 Buick Riviera front seat
The 1963-65 Buick Riviera had iconic styling but was outsold by the T-Bird by a two-to-one margin. Was that partly because the Riviera shared even dashboard parts with other Buicks (go here for further discussion)?

GM didn’t begin to outproduce the Thunderbird until 1966, when the Riviera was substantially redesigned and Oldsmobile got its own personal coupe (go here for a discussion about the Toronado). Then, a year later, Cadillac unveiled its own entry, the Eldorado. The Spanish Armada had arrived.

1963-76 personal coupe production by automaker

GM dominates the personal coupe market — for a while

GM captured a peak of 59 percent of the personal luxury coupe market in 1969. This was the same year the Riviera managed to edge past the Thunderbird in output. That would turn out to be the only time.

1970 Ford Thunderbird

1970 Buick Riviera
For 1970 the Thunderbird received controversial new styling — including the notorious “Bunkie’s beak” — but it still managed to outsell the Riviera despite the latter car getting a rare, one-year-only reskinning (Old Car Brochures).

Ford fought back with the Continental Mark III, which was the first Lincoln that was able to compete with Cadillac on an equal footing sales-wise. However, the GM trio inched back up to almost 59 percent of the market in 1971. This was probably due to GM introducing brand-new designs while Ford made few changes to the T-Bird and Mark III.

Also see ‘Did Wayne Kady screw up the 1974-76 Buick Riviera?’

The tables were turned in 1973, when the Thunderbird and Continental Mark IV together outsold the GM trio. This was partly the result of the T-Bird surpassing 87,000 units. That was the nameplate’s best year since 1964 — and its third-highest volume up to that point. Just as importantly, the T-Bird’s output was almost as high as the Riviera and Toronado put together.

1973 Buick Riviera
For 1973 the Riviera’s controversial boat-tailed rear and shark nose were toned down, but sales didn’t budge. Both the Thunderbird and the Mark IV outsold the Riviera by more than two-to-one. Go here for a photo gallery of a 1972 model.

Personal coupe sales soar despite escalating prices

Total production of personal luxury coupes soared 74 percent between 1971 and 1973. This occurred even though output for individual nameplates was closely grouped, mostly in the 50,000-to-70,000 range.

One exception was the boat-tailed Riviera, whose volume hovered around 34,000 units from 1971-73. In contrast, Toronado production rose by 84 percent to almost 54,000 units in 1973, making it the best-selling GM personal luxury coupe. This makes sense because the Toronado arguably received the most tasteful styling of the GM trio.

1963-76 premium- versus high-priced personal coupe production

Meanwhile, output for the Mark series and Eldorado soared despite list prices that were upwards of $3,000 higher than premium-priced entries such as the Thunderbird.

Gas shortages lead to changes in big personal coupes

An oil embargo in late-1973 and early-74 knocked the wind out of the full-sized personal coupe market. Over the next half decade both GM and Ford would significantly restructure their lineups.

1975 Ford Thunderbird

1976 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
The Thunderbird only sold only around 50,000 units per year in 1974-76. In contrast, between 250,000-350,000 Chevrolet Monte Carlos were produced, perhaps because it wasn’t as large and costly (Old Car Brochures).

The Thunderbird was losing its luster. It was inordinately big and lumbering at a time when Americans were shifting toward smaller, nimbler and more efficient cars. And whereas the T-Bird once had unique features, now looked too much like a decontented Mark IV (go here for further discussion). Not surprisingly, the T-Bird was outsold by its more expensive corporate sibling in 1975 and 1976.

1974 Ford Elite

1977 Ford Thunderbird side view
The Chevrolet Monte Carlo outsold the 1974-76 Ford Elite by more than two-to-one, so the car was given a fairly modest facelift in 1977 and renamed the Thunderbird. Go here and here for further discussion (Old Car Brochures).

What happened next is a story for another time. But for now, let’s give Ford — and particularly Robert McNamara — credit for recognizing the extraordinary potential of the four-seater Thunderbird.

NOTES:

This article that originally posted on Sept. 4, 2016 and expanded on Dec. 1, 2019, Oct. 1, 2021 and Nov. 17, 2023. Market share and production figures were calculated from base data from the auto editors of Consumer Guide (2006) and Gunnell (2002).

Share your reactions to this post with a comment below or a note to the editor.


RE:SOURCES

Encyclopedia of American Cars

ADVERTISING & BROCHURES:

  • oldcaradvertising.com: Ford Thunderbird (1958); General Motors (1955)
  • oldcarbrochures.org: Chevrolet Monte Carlo (1976); Ford Thunderbird (1960, 1962, 1966, 1968, 1970, 1976, 1977); Lincoln Continental (1962); Oldsmobile Starfire (1962); Pontiac Grand Prix (1962);

6 Comments

  1. It’s easy to see the success of the Squarebird as a precursor to the Mustang. It was also a close coupled, four passenger car with distinctive styling. It was a personal car that ate away at the T Bird’s market from the bottom. It was a well accepted car that was welcomed by a wide range of buyers. Both in age and income. It was priced well, equipped well, and it could be personalized by all the available options. Anybody looked cool driving it and it was accessible to almost everyone. After the debut of the posher Cougar,I suppose that the T Bird had no choice to move even more up market.

  2. I agree with Mr. Delgadillo. The panache of the 1958-1966 Thunderbird was lost, not to be recovered until the breakthrough 1983-1999 aero Thunderbirds. The 1967-1973 Thunderbirds were luxurious, but they were not “sporty”. The 1962-1964 Grand Prix and Starfires were sporty, but not up to Thunderbird status. The 1962-1964 Buick Wildcat was simply a bucket seat / console equipped Invicta. Really, Pontiac’s and Oldsmobile’s sporty image became tied to the G.T.O.s and Cutlass 442s. After 1964, G.M.’s full-size cars (Bonneville, Grand Prix, Wildcat, and the final Starfires) were simply bucket-seat / console trimmed BIG CARS, like the Ford Galaxie 500-XL and Chrysler non-letter 300s. When I was a teenager in the 1960s, the intermediate coupes with big engines became the focus, but the Riviera was a hot car until 1966, the Thunderbird until 1966 and every Corvette was unattainable… Then came the Mustang in April, 1964 and the Cougar in 1967. Even though I was not a Ford fan then, when I saw a neighbor’s Cougar XR-7, I was an instant admirer. Another newspaper customer of mine had a 1965 Starfire and acquired a 1966 Toronado, but they were HUGE cars. Maybe Ford should have made Thunderbirds available at Lincoln-Mercury dealers as well, but then with the Continental Marks there was really no place for the T-Bird after 1967. Maybe Ford should have made a trimmer, sportier Thunderbird to fit in between the Cougar and the Lincoln Marks. After 1966. the T-Bird was not “unique in all the world”. When I saw the Ford Elite in 1976, I could not understand what that meant for the future of the Thunderbird. Frankly, I think this is another example of how Lee Iacocca led Ford into a dead-end in the 1970s after he helped freeze out Bunkie Knudsen.

    • I see we share the same sentiments about which Thunderbirds were truly “unique in all the world”, lol. You make a good point about a T-Bird fitting between the original Cougar & Mk III. That could have effectively been done using the all new Torino/Montego platform starting in 1970. However, Ford always had to squeeze every penny out of their platforms, so it is doubtful they wanted the Mk IV to be a stand-alone especially in that price class. Still, it’s an intriguing idea, one that would probably have seen Mercury be forced to kill off the Cougar at the end of the ’73 model year. Or come up with a Bobcat-based version for 74-1/2 😲!

  3. Between 1967 & 1976 Ford didn’t know what to do with the T-Bird. The 4-door was a bean counter special and made the T-Bird far less “unique in all the world”. It got fatter and less distinctive and you couldn’t give away the mid-late ’70s Mk 4-based Birds when they became used cars, they were so unloved. Going downmarket to compete against the Monte Carlo made Ford big profits but you can’t claw back up to the premium market segment after the masses have been given a taste at the lower end. Ford forgot what the T-Bird was and didn’t care. The Aero-Birds onward, including the ’02-’05 2-seater, lacked the glamour and desirability of the ’55-’66 Birds. That’s a very long time to prove – yet again – that Detroit can’t and won’t build real luxury cars.

  4. A few random thoughts here about this post and the subsequent comments:

    1.) Harley Earl was on the right track in 1953 by presenting the Buick Skylark, the Oldsmobile Fiesta and the Cadillac Eldorado; however, the sheetmetal was not all that distinctive from the Roadmaster, the 98 or the De Ville, just more standard features and the finest upholstery. The Buick and Olds halo cars really did not last too long and were gone by the 1955 model year. Perhaps if they had been based on the Century and the Super 88 with distinctive trim and sheetmetal details (sectioning the bodies like G.M. Fisher Body did with the early Eldorados ?). The low profile of the 1955-1966 Thunderbirds was part of their distinction.

    2.) The problem with Studebaker and its management in terms of styling after 1949 was its failure to move on from the influence of Raymond Lowey. From 1950 to 1961 Studebaker cars were very much an acquired taste for most domestic car buyers, and in some cases, downright ugly (the 1954-1955 sedans). The Lowey 1953 Coupe was best with Brook Stevens’ G.T. revisions in 1962-1964. While the 1958-1957 sedan and wagon restyle was much more mainstream, by then it was too late and the Lark was a stopgap that continued until the end.

    3.) The G.M. E-bodies for the 1970 Riviera and Toronado were not significantly changed from the 1968-1969 bodies, as the bumper-blunting had taken place in 1968. The addition to the Riviera was the fender skirts for 1970 and a really ugly front clip and less than flattering side trim. Bill Mitchell must have been on an extended vacation.

    4.) Do you really think the reason why the T-bird outsold the 1963-1965 Riviera was because of the shared dashboard with other Buicks ? I really doubt it. Now if the dashboard had been shared with a Chevy Nova, then there might have been a problem.

    5.) The 1963 Buick Riviera began as a trimmer halo car for Cadillac as noted by Maurice Hendrey in his history of Cadillac, proposed as the LaSalle II and then refined by Bill Mitchell into the Silver Arrow I.
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=g8uGWZrV&id=39CD4FF7C8AD0938C32F1A2A379FB2D4FDD7974A&thid=OIP.g8uGWZrV0esUYib22YXHGwHaEy&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fi.pinimg.com%2foriginals%2f11%2fd3%2f2c%2f11d32c8ea0e2ea159697ef8b71b4dd92.png&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.83cb86599ad5d1eb146226f6d985c71b%3frik%3dSpfX%252fdSynzcqGg%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=563&expw=872&q=bill+mitchell+lasalle+concept+car&simid=607992135027743366&FORM=IRPRST&ck=035AB8D2FF9AF205BD8B56878FE2E8B7&selectedIndex=69&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0
    https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=nVAIEapW&id=6403382A4F515E0955C7AF7861F93B9D65F803BF&thid=OIP.nVAIEapWtfK_vS-d7najngHaEE&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fwww.macsmotorcitygarage.com%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2015%2f06%2fSilver-Arrow-600×320-500×275.jpg&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.9d500811aa56b5f2bfbd2f9dee76a39e%3frik%3dvwP4ZZ07%252bWF4rw%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=275&expw=500&q=bill+mitchell+buick+silver+arrow+i&simid=608048721229470012&FORM=IRPRST&ck=7491CFD9B3D644B41B18A3F02D4E2686&selectedIndex=4&qpvt=bill+mitchell+buick+silver+arrow+i&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0 .

    • Regarding No. 4, I stated in the text: “Perhaps part of the Riviera’s problem was that it was based upon the full-sized Buick. Even though it had unique sheetmetal, it didn’t come off as distinctive as the T-Bird.” And then in the cutline I wrote that the Riviera “shared even dashboard parts with other Buicks” (italics added).

      The Riviera’s design is further discussed here. For example, because it was based on the full-sized GM body it had flat rather than curved side glass, which resulted in an old-fashioned pontoon look.

      So, no, I don’t think that someone would reject the Riviera after noticing that it shared dashboard components with regular Buicks. However, the car did not have the exotic qualities of the Thunderbird.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*