Also see ‘1965-66 AMC Marlin: Fixing beginner’s mistakes’
“Ad Nauseam” is a regular feature that parodies automotive ads and brochures. We start off with themes from actual ad copy and riff from there. For further discussion about what is real, go here.
Harry Waltz knew that, as the lowest guy on the totem poll, he would get stuck having to write the 1982 Cadillac Cimarron ads. He tried every trick in the book to avoid the inevitable, […]
David Burrell of Retroautos has written one of the better overviews of the downsized 1962 Dodge and Plymouth, but he also displays some of the genre’s limitations. Unlike some other historical accounts, Burrell questioned the […]
Copyright © 2022 Olympia, Earth Media, LLC | All rights reserved
The Marlin’s standard interior held 6 swingin’ people? Rambler’s most exciting car ever? (l know – the “Rambler” name was about to get the “heave-hoe”.) It was not the most exciting in performance (remember the ’57 Rebel?) and the front end styling of the first two years of the exciting-ish Marlin were obviously and unfortunately VERY closely derived from the very “pedestrian”-styled Classic model.
Although the Studebaker Gran Turismo Hawk was only made for a small orgy (5), it almost sold as many cars in it’s 2 and 1/3rd years than AMC sold Marlins in 3 seasons. Studebaker had fewer and less energetic dealers, but the GT Hawk seems to have been the better car for ’60s “swingers”, and much more of a “personal” car with it’s totally separate and elegant body (a la T-Bird and later ’69 Grand Prix and ’70 Monte Carlo).
As has been noted in other articles, the Marlin may have been a better seller if it had been put into production without change from the Tarpon concept car. Maybe they could have supercharged or turboed a six if they couldn’t shoe-horn an AMC V8 into an American body at the time. It would have beaten the Camaro/Firebird to the market and been in the thick of the pony car game. Opportunity lost.
And if Studebaker had ….. well, lots of opportunities lost there, too!