Also see ‘1965-66 AMC Marlin: Fixing beginner’s mistakes’
“Ad Nauseam” is a regular feature that parodies automotive ads and brochures. We start off with themes from actual ad copy and riff from there. For further discussion about what is real, go here.
GM envy is a tendency of other automakers — first domestic and later foreign — to slavishly copy the basic structure and strategy used by General Motors in its heyday. This has occurred despite General […]
This is an oversized soft-cover book that covers the Ford Mustang’s history through the 2011 model year. The Complete Book places an emphasis on large, mostly color pictures accompanied by product specifications. However, author Mike Mueller […]
Copyright © 2022 Olympia, Earth Media, LLC | All rights reserved
The Marlin’s standard interior held 6 swingin’ people? Rambler’s most exciting car ever? (l know – the “Rambler” name was about to get the “heave-hoe”.) It was not the most exciting in performance (remember the ’57 Rebel?) and the front end styling of the first two years of the exciting-ish Marlin were obviously and unfortunately VERY closely derived from the very “pedestrian”-styled Classic model.
Although the Studebaker Gran Turismo Hawk was only made for a small orgy (5), it almost sold as many cars in it’s 2 and 1/3rd years than AMC sold Marlins in 3 seasons. Studebaker had fewer and less energetic dealers, but the GT Hawk seems to have been the better car for ’60s “swingers”, and much more of a “personal” car with it’s totally separate and elegant body (a la T-Bird and later ’69 Grand Prix and ’70 Monte Carlo).
As has been noted in other articles, the Marlin may have been a better seller if it had been put into production without change from the Tarpon concept car. Maybe they could have supercharged or turboed a six if they couldn’t shoe-horn an AMC V8 into an American body at the time. It would have beaten the Camaro/Firebird to the market and been in the thick of the pony car game. Opportunity lost.
And if Studebaker had ….. well, lots of opportunities lost there, too!