What’s next for Curbside Classic in wake of Paul Niedermeyer’s retirement?

Curbside Classic Publisher Paul Niedermeyer

(EXPANDED FROM 11/27/2022)

The retirement of Curbside Classic founder Paul Niedermeyer (2023) raises questions about the direction of the pioneering auto history website. He announced his retirement, effective immediately, only a few weeks after the death of a family member (W. Niedermeyer, 2023).

Daniel Stern and Rich Baron were named co-executive editors. This is in keeping with Niedermeyer’s (2022) previously announced goal of not selling the website or handing over the reins to “someone that is not already a CC insider.”

The stepping down of a founder can be a sensitive time for any media outlet. Those who haven’t worked in journalism may not fully appreciate how much time and varied skills it takes to run a website of Curbside Classic’s size. My sense is that Niedermeyer has succeeded where others have not because of his extraordinary level of commitment and an unusually eclectic background. I suspect that it would be very difficult to find one person who could fill his shoes.

Also see ‘Should auto history websites only say nice things?’

This is why it makes sense that Niedermeyer has put together an editorial team. The challenge is that a team can be harder to maintain over time. Thus, I wouldn’t be surprised if Curbside Classic ended up downshifting in some respects, such as by reducing the number of posts per week. If that occurred, it wouldn’t be a bad compromise if it kept the website’s vast repository of content online.

Another big question is whether Stern and Baron take Curbside Classic in new directions. When Niedermeyer (2019a) previously announced his retirement, his successor Jim Klein (2019) sounded like a caretaker editor. Niedermeyer (2019b) returned a few months later from what was relabeled a sabbatical. It was only then that a number of major changes were made, mainly to put the website on a more solid revenue footing (2019c, 2020).

I hope that Stern and Baron feel empowered to do more than caretake. Curbside Classic may have almost single-handedly redefined what an auto history website can be, but it has become dated in some respects.

1962 Ford F-100 turn signal

Niedermeyer created a neighborhood pub of websites

When Niedermeyer launched Curbside Classic in 2011, one of his best ideas was to generate a significant amount of content from an army of volunteers. As a result, the website’s volume of daily postings rivals that of established media outlets such as Hemmings and Collectible Automobile.

As might be expected of a website that relies so heavily on volunteers, Curbside Classic may sometimes lack the journalistic depth of media outlets produced by professional writers, such as Ate Up With Motor.

Also see ‘Does the Internet dumb down auto history?’

Another one of Niedermeyer’s good ideas was to throw away the rule book on what kind of content an auto history website should include. Curbside Classic has been unusually eclectic, analytical and playful, particularly compared to older media outlets run by larger companies.

Curbside Classic’s comment threads have the quality of a friendly neighborhood pub. They are among the more lively, thoughtful and civil of U.S .auto media outlets. The threads sometimes include important nuggets of historical information that I draw upon in my own writing (go here for an example).

Three Citroens

A fresh approach that can be rough around the edges

Curbside Classic is unusual in showing the human side of cars. One of my all-time favorite posts is Niedermeyer’s (2012) poignant “auto-biography” about a youthful road trip. Another favorite is an essay that weaves together a pun-filled discussion about an impending colonoscopy and a 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass colonnade (Niedermeyer, 2018). I bet you’ve never seen anything like that in Hemmings or Collectible Automobile.

Curbside Classic has also tended to have more “guy talk” — despite a rare female commentator offering an eye-opening critique (go here). Niedermeyer seemed to see his target market narrowly. For example, a headline for a story he wrote on 1970s vans announced that it had a “racy” ad — which included a young lady with bare breasts (Niedermeyer, 2021). Racy for whom?

Also see ‘What would happen to auto history media if they outlawed clickbait?’

Niedermeyer apparently had relatively little training and experience in “print” journalism prior to launching Curbside Classic. The positive side of the coin is that this undoubtedly helped him come up with a fresh approach to a car buff website. The negative side is that Curbside Classic has appeared to be “unprofessional” in some respects, such as how it has dealt with copyright issues.

If I could wave a magic wand and change one thing, it would be the website’s design. I get eye strain reading longer pieces because the body text is so small. And how about some social-media share buttons?

Kestner homestead abandoned truck

A case study of the value and challenges of small media

Curbside Classic postings sometimes challenge Detroit groupthink, but political topics are understandably avoided and industry analysis can get overshadowed by personal stories — which is arguably as it should be for this type of website.

Although a goodly portion of the content has tended to be analytically light or even clickbaity, over the years Curbside Classic has published a number of writers with terrific historical chops, such as Roger Carr and TATRA87.

Nevertheless, for me Niedermeyer’s writing has always been the top attraction. His longer pieces can be sprawling affairs, but they routinely offer a more provocative analysis than found in the big-time auto history websites. A good example of this is Niedermeyer’s epic exploration of the origins of the downsized 1962 Dodge and Plymouth (see link below).

Also see ‘Did a rumor cause the downsized 1962 Plymouth and Dodge?’

A steady flow of content from volunteers has apparently been crucial to Curbside Classic generating enough ad revenue to stay in business. One downside is that people can be difficult to manage. It thus strikes me as inevitable that a contributor would leave in a huff. That occurred with Laurence Jones (2021), who went on to post a public critique of Niedermeyer. This conflict is a good example of why Indie Auto has no aspirations to move beyond being a solo operation.

Like other small-scale media outlets, Curbside Classic has had ups and downs that have raised questions about its future. Go here for further discussion about how the advertising industry has influenced the website’s finances.

I hope that despite Niedermeyer’s retirement, Curbside Classic manages to generate the revenue needed to keep it online for years to come. This is a uniquely valuable website that, in its own quirky way, has made important contributions to automotive history. Indie Auto wishes Stern and Baron well in their new roles.

Curbside Classic

  • Free access; donations requested

RE:SOURCES

This review was first posted Jan. 22, 2018 and expanded on Nov. 22, 2022 and May 25, 2023.

11 Comments

  1. I’ve been a fan and a faithful reader of Curbside Classics for over ten years.The emphasis that “every car has a story” results in most of the stories detailing the writer’s personal connection with the featured vehicles. I like this direction, more about what a specific car means to us, rather than technical or sales numbers analysis. I have described it as a party that Paul has invited us to attend, so we should behave ourselves. The conversation is centered around recollections and nostalgia. It often drifts into quite personal revelations, thanks to talented contributors like Joseph Dennis.
    I have been a long time commentor, and this experience encouraged me to start my own automotive blog which is even more chaotic, unorganized, and subjective than anything that you’d ever find on CC! I would like to be a contributor to Curbside Classics and I’m preparing a series to submit to them. That’s the beautiful thing about the internet, there’s lot’s of room for the amateur to produce their own site. Indie Auto is a more professionally produced, more analytical, and factually based site, which I also enjoy.
    I congratulate Paul on giving birth to, and nurturing, this wonderful website. I’m sure we haven’t heard the last of Mr. Niedermeyer.

    • Jose, I agree with your sentiment and am glad to hear that you plan to write for Curbside Classic. Your writing strikes me as an excellent match with their format — and you could find a lot of new supporters of your work.

      I have no insight into Paul’s life beyond what I read in Curbside Classic, which I check out daily. However, even if he never did another thing in the auto history realm, his legacy is secure.

      What I do may be a bit closer to that of Aaron Severson’s Ate Up With Motor, but I wouldn’t have had the courage to launch Indie Auto if Curbside Classic hadn’t been around.

        • Understood. Paul’s involvement with Curbside Classic has zigged and zagged enough over the years that I would be hesitant to make predictions about what things might look like a year or two down the road. However, one constant has been reposting old content, so Paul’s articles would presumably continue to be an important part of Curbside Classic’s front page even if he stopped writing new ones.

  2. I just got into CC a month or so ago and really enjoyh it. Two questions for Jose Delgadillo. 1. I checked Indie’s links and didn’t see anything looking like your blog. Could you furnish a URL? 2. By any chance are you related to Angel Delgadillo the Route 66 historian?

  3. I’m another long-time Curbivore. 🙂 I discovered Indie Auto from a mention on CC.
    I wrote a Car Of A Lifetime article for Paul on my ’74 Cortina, which ran in 2015 and then again earlier this year, and I have a series of articles on model cars in the pipeline. Rich is vetting the first one at the moment.

  4. The warmest greetings from Argentina, I don’t know how it’ll be possible to keep reading Curbside Classic without the presence of Niedermeyer . Besides he is a living automotive’s encyclopaedic man , he is also such a knight . He currently replies to all of our enquires about all type of automobiles. He always shown the same respect for an American brand as well for the unknown brands from the very far away . He has his own criteria so he never underrated the name of whatever carmaker. To say the whole true , Mr Paul Niedermeyer’s professionalism made it possible to Curbsideclassic® becoming the BEST worldwide website devoted to the automobile’s passion. Even we the readers from abroad are mindly so attached to his brilliant intellect.

    • Mr. Niedermeyer still occasionally writes articles and comments on CC. However, I still check CC daily but spend less time on it than before.

    • Over the years I have seen enough interpersonal conflicts on small-scale publications that I’ve become hesitant to draw hard-and-fast conclusions if I am observing from afar. That said, one of my doctoral program’s professors had good advice about how to approach a debate with professional colleagues: Be tough on ideas and soft on people. And given how social media in particular can quickly spiral out of control, if a debate gets too shrill my inclination is to step away from the computer. There’s a big, beautiful world out there and life is short.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*